
This post and several others to follow are intended to narrate how I approach teaching about insect rearing systems and how I approach developing and improving these systems. I am writing this page on February 14, 2025 almost 50 years after I started out in insect rearing at the University of Arizona and the USDA, Agricultural Research Service in August of 1979. During this time, I have had several successes and several failures at developing and/or improving rearing systems. It has become the focus of my life to better understand why systems and the components of those systems work or fail. These pages are my effort to explain what I have learned in trying to understand the scientific principles behind rearing.

First, the concept of the rearing system as an ecological niche: before I was an entomologist/rearing specialist, I was an ecologist. Over the years, I have come to appreciate the reality that as rearing specialists, we are obligated to provide all the components that our insects would have in nature–only we must put them all into our rearing system. THIS IS TO SAY THAT OUR REARING SYSTEMS ARE ARTIFICIAL ECOLOGICAL NICHES!
As “NICHE-KEEPERS,” we must provide the food, the gas exchange, the heat, light, humidity, sites for oviposition, microbial relations, mating sites, oviposition sites, etc., etc. Are we giving our insects the right conditions to safely void their urine and fecal wastes? You watch a leaf-eating caterpillar in nature dropping its frass from the leaf-feeding site to the ground. How must they release their wastes in our containers? We know what is convenient for us as the rearing personnel, but is that what is best for the insects?
The two pictures in this post show a little of what I mean by factors in the ecological niche concept of insect rearing systems. The top picture is an attempt for me to show in multiple dimensions (based on G. Evelyn Hutchinson’s “N-Dimensional Hypervolume” as the model of an ecological niche). The idea here is that CO2 generation and O2 uptake are not only related to one-another, but they relate to the thermal conditions and the food the insect is eating. The ratio of CO2/O2 or the respiratory quotient are indicators of whether the insect is metabolising mainly carbohydrates, lipids, or proteins. If being a little confusing with all this and other factors seen in the top diagram, it’s what I intend to do to convince you that this is all pretty complex and VERY INTER-RELATED stuff.
The second picture showing the diet (developed by R.T. Yamamoto 1969) for Manduca sexta is also a complex of components such as wheat germ, casein protein, torula yeast, vitamins, and minerals that are all interacting with one-another to give the diet a composition, texture, consistency, and configuration that help determine the success of our tobacco hornworm rearing system. One reason that the diet is (in my opinion) so successful for M. sexta is that it provides lipids (fatty acids and sterols, for example) in the form of lipoproteins which make these essential lipids bioavailable for the larvae. One of the wonderful features of wheat germ is that it contains nutritious proteins with all the essential amino acids, but also some of these proteins are lipoproteins, which carry the lipids in a bioavailable way compatible with our hornworms’ digestive system.
More along this line in my next blog entry. Happy Valentine’s Day!